Securing Nuclear Materials: a comparison of key initiatives

August 24, 2004

For more information contact: Robert Gard, rgard@armscontrolcenter.org

 

BUSH ADMINISTRATION

Global Threat Reduction

Initiative, May 2004

U.S. CONGRESS

Senate Amendment to FY 05 Defense Authorization Bill (Sen. Domenici)

JOHN KERRY'S PROPOSALS AS OF 1 JUNE 2004

HARVARD'S BELFER CENTER

March 2003 and May 2004 Reports

CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT for INT'L. PEACE

Draft Report,

June 2004

Impact on Russia

Repatriate all Russian-origin fresh HEU by the end of 2005.  Accelerate and complete repatriation of Russian- origin spent fuel by 2010. Accelerate efforts to secure, remove or eliminate fissile materials from reactors and other vulnerable sites around the world. Move vulnerable materials from unsecured sites in Russia to more secure sites in Russia within 4 years. Remove weapons-usable nuclear material from civilian research reactors and other vulnerable sites within 4 years. Rapidly repatriate fuel from former Soviet Republics.

Impact Worldwide

Accelerate and complete repatriation of all U.S.-origin spent fuel within 10 years.            Arrange for secure packaging and shipment of fissile materials to countries willing to accept and secure it or to the United States. Remove bomb making material from vulnerable sites around the world within 4 years. Arrange for safe and secure transport of materials to secure sites in the United States and other willing countries. Remove and secure weapons-usable materials from vulnerable sites within 4 years.

Converting Fuel

Convert civilian research reactor            s that use HEU to use low enriched uranium (in U.S. by 2013) and throughout the world. Convert research and other reactors fueled by HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU) and alternative fuels. Help Russia accelerate the process of blending down HEU and disposing of plutonium. Shut down unnecessary reactors and convert those for which there is a continuing need to LEU fuel. Pursue a more aggressive policy to end the use of HEU in research reactors and accelerate efforts with Russia to develop LEU fuels.

Security Upgrades

  Provide for interim security upgrades at vulnerable sites and long-term upgrades at sites where materials will remain for extended periods of time.   Provide interim security upgrades for the period until fissile material can be removed. Provide rapid security upgrades at Russian sites within 1 year.

Closures and Incentives

  Provide assistance in the closure and decommissioning of sites identified as high risk.   Offer a range of incentives for facilities to give up fissile material at their site.       

Multilateral Engagement

International cooperation will be needed. Support the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and other countries to facilitate the removal of fissile materials and complete security upgrades at vulnerable sites. Support the IAEA to strengthen their rigorous inspection protocols. G-8 leaders should agree to launch a "Strategic Materials Accelerated Removal and Transport" initiative to complete removal efforts within 5 years. Work with other countries, such as NATO members, to develop an international response force in the event of theft from vulnerable sites.

U.S. Government Implementation

 

Establish a single organization within DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration to focus on these efforts.            Establish a task force at DOE with wide authority to secure, remove and dispose of fissile material around the world. Establish a National Coordinator for Nuclear Terrorism and Counterproliferation Establish an office at DOE that consolidates resources, authority and expertise for all efforts.  

Funding

Dedicate $450 million for these efforts over 10 years.  More funding will be necessary but the sources of such funding have not been identified. Additional $40 million per year over current funding of about $9 million (to be requested in the Energy  and Water Appropriations bill).   Funding of $50 million per year. Funding of $50 million per year.

Sources:

Remarks by Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham to the IAEA, May 26, 2004

http://www.doe.gov/engine/content.do?PUBLIC_ID=15949&BT_CODE=PR_SPEECHES&TT_CODE=PRESSSPEECH

S. Amdt. 3192 to S. 2400 (FY 2005 National Defense Authorization Act)

http://thomas.loc.gov

Bunn, Matt, Anthony Wier and John Holdren, Controlling Nuclear Warheads and Materials: A Report Card and Action Plan, March 2003

http://nti.org/e_research/cnwm/overview/report.asp

Bunn, Matt, Anthony Wier, Securing the Bomb: An Agenda for Action, May 2004

http://nti.org/e_research/cnwm/overview/2004report.asp

Speech by John Kerry on 1 June 2004

http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2004_0601.html

Cirincione, Joseph, et al., Universal Compliance:  A Strategy for Nuclear Security, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, June 2004.

For more information contact: Robert Gard, rgard@armscontrolcenter.org