Monday, September 25, 2006
India-US: Partners of Convenience?
Rediff News
“India-US: Partners of Convenience?” Rediff News, 9-25-06
Michael Krepon, co-founder of the Henry L. Stimson Center in DC, warns that in light of actions taken at the Non-Aligned Movement summit earlier this month, the US should be wary of both Pakistan and India.
http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/sep/25mk.htm
India forces PM's hand on uranium
Sydney Morning Herald
“India forces PM’s hand on uranium,” Sydney Morning Herald, 9-25-06
India has been urging Australia to change its policies and agree to supply uranium to India’s civil program. Australia is now in the position of either offending India, its 4th biggest export market, or changing long-standing and haloed policies protecting nonproliferation. There is disagreement in the Canberra government over how to respond.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/india-forces-pms-hand-on-uranium/2006/09/24/1159036415692.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
India should retain nuclear test option
Rediff News
“India should retain nuclear test option: BJP leader,” Rediff News, 9-25-06
Senior BJP leader and former union minister, Murli Manohar Joshi, stated that India must maintain its nuclear test option, and blasted PM Singh’s government for compromising India’s strategic and food security by appeasing the US.
http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/sep/25ndeal1.htm
South Africa keen on nulcear tie-up with India
Rediff News
“South Africa keen on nuclear tie-up with India,” Rediff News, 9-24-06
South Africa has stated its desire for civil nuclear cooperation with India, and that it will support changes in the Nuclear Suppliers Group, of which it is a key member. South Africa is a uranium rich country and is eager to sell its deposits to India.
http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/sep/24ndeal.htm
US Business Council batting for the nuclear deal
Rediff News
“US Business Council batting for nuclear deal,” Rediff News, 9-25-06
President of the US-India Business Council, Ron Somers, is leading a campaign to ensure the smooth passage of civil nuclear bill through Congress. Somers sees the deal as the key to huge economic opportunities for US firms in India. He is backed by US multinationals such as Ford and Boeing.
http://inhome.rediff.com/money/2006/sep/25somers.htm
US-India Nuclear Deal called 'unacceptable'
One World United States
“US-India Nuclear Deal called ‘unacceptable’”, One World United States, 9-25-06
Anti-nuke DC-based lobby group calls for the US Senate to vote down the civil nuclear deal with India. The Council for a Livable World says the deal undermines global nonproliferation efforts and that tough amendments must be added in the final legislation.
http://us.oneworld.net/article/view/139768/1/
Friday, September 22, 2006
N-deal will nullify India's NAM leadership: CPM
The Peninsula
“N-deal will nullify India’s NAM leadership: CPM,” The Peninsula, 9-22-06
The Communist Party of India-Marxist says that if the civil nuclear deal goes through, India will be unable to lead the Non-Aligned Movement. The left party sees the N-deal as dictating India’s foreign policy and aligning it too close with the US.
http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/Display_news.asp?section=World_News&subsection=India&month=September2006&file=World_News2006092281849.xml
N-dal: Pranab, Rice talk shop
Times of India
“N-deal: Pranab, Rice talk shop,” Times of India, 9-22-06
Indian Defense Minister Pranab Mukherjee and US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice held an in-depth discussion on the civil nuclear deal. Also present were Indian Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran and Indian Ambassador to the UN Nirupam Sen. The group also discussed international and regional issues of mutual concern.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-2015825,curpg-1.cms
India N-deal gets a diplomatic push
Hindustan Times
“India N-deal gets a diplomatic push,” Hindustan Times, 9-22-06
Indian Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran has been in New York and DC pushing for the conclusion of the civil nuclear deal, raising the hopes of some that Congress will get t the bill before the end of session. The ‘Hold’ Senator Ensign placed on the bill has been removed because of changes in language made to Title ii.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1803107,00050001.htm
US-India nuclear deal may stall in Congress as time runs out
Bloomberg News
“US-India nuclear deal may stall in Congress as time runs out,” Bloomberg, 9-22-06
The nuclear cooperation bill is unlikely to be finalized before the November elections. While it may be introduced in the Senate next week, there will be very little time for the two houses to reconcile their differences and produce final legislation. Also, there remains much reservation and uncertainty in the NSG concerning the deal.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aZYi_CxhEAV0&refer=us
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
Only IAEA is competent to examine Tehran's nuclear dossier: Rowhani
Mehr News Service
“Only IAEA is competent to examine Tehran’s nuclear dossier: Rowhani,” Mehr News Agency, 9-19-06
India’s Ambassador to Iran, Manbir Singh, states that India is determined to forge closer ties with Iran. This, he believes, will help India gain greater access to Central Asia.
http://www.mehrnews.ir/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=382775
China will not play spolier in NSG: Strobe Talbott
Hindustan Times
“China will not play spoiler in NSG: Strobe Talbott,” Hindustan Times, 9-20-06
Former US deputy Secretary of State, Strobe Talbott, says China will be the spoiler in the NSG in the India-US nuke deal changes. Although Chin will undoubtedly ask questions about the deal, the line of its new foreign policy is to be friends with everyone and improve relations with India, says Talbott. He also stated that no one in the NSG would stop the deal, and that it would clear the US Congress as well.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1801295,001301790001.htm
Boeing seeks to boost presence, sales in India
Market Watch
“Boeing seeks to boost presence, sales in India,” Market Watch, 9-20-06
Boeing Co. will sell a wide array of defense equipment and services to India, increasing its presence there. The passage of the N-deal will make it much easier for Boeing to conduct defense business with India.
http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&siteid=google&guid=%7B103BF804-216C-461A-A0ED-F85C64FCF9A8%7D&keyword=
Community continues nuke deal lobby on Capital Hill
India Post News Service
“Community continues nuke deal lobby on Capital Hill,” India Post News Service, 9-20-06
Thirty lawmakers from both houses and parties in Congress attended an event hosted by various India-American groups to promote the civil nuke deal. Senators Biden and Schumer said the deal will easily pass the Senate without a filibuster. Senator Clinton called the deal pivotal to US-India long-term relations. This was the second such lobbying event by Indian-American groups.
http://www.indiapost.com/members/story.php?story_id=5593
US Commerce Chamber asks Senate to pass India N-bill
Hindustan Times
“US Chamber of Commerce asks Senate to pass India N-bill,” Hindustan Times, 9-20-06
The US Chamber of Commerce, the world’s largest business federation, urged the US Senate to clear the civil nuke bill with India. In a letter to Senate, the Chamber states that the bill will lay the foundation for a long and lucrative partnership, with investment opportunities already estimated at $170 billion. While the letter focused on the business benefits, it mentioned a positive step for non-proliferation.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1801282,0008.htm
US-India relations to grow closer on back of landmark nuclear accord
Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
“US-India relations to grow closer on back of landmark nuclear accord,” Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, 9-15-06
Experts spoke of the benefits to India from the civil nuclear deal with the US. Dr. Ashley Tellis says it will not tie India’s hands, but will lift up its status. Others talk of the benefits to the economy from the modernization of the nuclear energy sector. On the American side some saw India as a counter-weight to China a benefit for the US.
http://www.jinsa.org/articles/articles.html/function/view/categoryid/1949/documentid/3536/history/3,2360,1947,1949,3536
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
India, Pakistan must end arms race
Daily News & Analysis
“India, Pakistan must end arms race,” Daily News & Analysis, 9-19-06
Peace activists from India and Pakistan together called on India to remove itself from the civil nuclear deal with the US. They say true peace can only be established when the arms races and further nuclear proliferation stops.
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1053825
US companies push Indian nuke deal
United Press International
“US companies push Indian nuke deal,” United Press International, 9-19-06
Major US businesses are lobbying US Senate for passage of the civil nuclear bill. Leading business chiefs and former government officials have sent a joint letter to the Senate urging approval. Businesses see big opportunities in India, especially in the $15 billion arms upgrade market.
http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060918-104200-6098r
Indo-US nuke deal should abide by NPT rules
Times of India
“Indo-US nuke deal should abide by NPT rules,” Times of India, 9-19-06
China has asked India and the US to abide by the existing non-proliferation regime when formulating their N-deal. China has been reluctant to back the deal because India has never joined the NPT and the deal could threaten global nonproliferation efforts.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2007104.cms
China may question Indo-US nuke deal
Financial Express
“China may question Indo-US nuke deal,” Financial Express, 9-19-06
Former Deputy Secretary of State, Strobe Talbott says China will most likely question the nuclear deal when it comes before the NSG. China will want to know why there should be an exception for India and not Pakistan. Talbott thinks a better deal could have been negotiated by the Bush administration to include a fissile material cutoff agreement.
http://www.financialexpress.com/latest_full_story.php?content_id=140828
Security vital in US-India nuke deal
Christian Science Monitor
“Security vital in US-India nuke deal,” Christian Science Monitor, 9-19-06
More attention should be paid to how the pending civil nuke deal can increase the threat of terrorist attacks against Indian nuclear facilities, writes security expert Charles Ferguson. The deal will give India more plutonium to be at risk, a greater number of facilities/targets, greater number of possible attacks and saboteurs, and a reputation for being closer to the US. India intell has before stated that Islamic militants could target nuclear sites.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20060919/cm_csm/yferguson
Monday, September 18, 2006
Bush promises Indo-US nuke deal by month-end
Hindustan Times
“Bush promises Indo-US nuke deal by month-end,” Hindustan Times, 9-18-06
The Bush administration assured the Indian government that US Senate will pass legislation on the civil nuclear deal in September, said a senior Indian official. He went on to add that both sides want to accelerate the process by beginning the 123 Agreement negotiations before the legislation is even passed by US Congress.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1797356,001301790001.htm
Seeing India in a New Light
The Organiser
“Seeing India in a New Light,” The Organiser, 9-18-06
Indian scientists are worried over the US nuclear deal. Senior scientist Homi Setha urges India to sign the NPT instead of the US deal, because the US deal holds India in perpetuity. A former Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, Shri P K Iyenger, is also against the deal because he says it will cap India’s strategic program. The Left in India is unhappy with US arms sales to Pakistan.
http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=149&page=43
US, China rivalry spurs debate in India
Boston Globe
“US, China rivalry spurs debate in India,” Boston Globe, 9-16-06
Both China and the US see India as the prize in their increasing rivalry. President Bush has offered a new Strategic Partnership with India to woo it to the US side. This includes the civilian nuclear deal. There is no consensus in the Indian elite over which country is best for them.
http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2006/09/17/us_china_rivalry_spurs_debate_in_india/?page=2
Friday, September 15, 2006
American Firms eyeing Indian nuke deal
Financial Express
“American firms eyeing Indian nuke market,” Financial Express, 9-14-06
US companies are closely watching the developments of the nuke deal’s passage through Congress as they prepare to move early and cash in on India’s emerging nuclear market. Firms such as Washington Group International, possessing high-level nuclear expertise, are looking to play a sub-contractor role in India.
http://www.financialexpress.com/latest_full_story.php?content_id=140394
Brazil, SA back Indo-US nuke deal
Financial Express
“Brazil, SA back Indo-US nuke deal,” Financial Express, 9-14-06
Brazil and South Africa have expressed support for changing the rules of the NSG to allow India to enter the nuclear market. Brazil is currently the chair of the NSG. Both Brazil and South Africa gave up their nuclear weapons program and joined the NPT, a thing India has not done. Their support is seen to boost the chance that US Congress will pass the deal.
http://www.financialexpress.com/latest_full_story.php?content_id=140394
Nuclear program will continue: Kakodkar
The Hindu
“Nuclear program will continue: Kakodkar,” The Hindu, 9-14-06
Kakodkar, head of the Atomic Energy Commission says there will be no changes in the framework of the deal if accepted. India will still be able to continue its strategic program while securing additional energy resources through nuclear power with the deal.
http://www.hindu.com/2006/09/14/stories/2006091408861200.htm
Indo-US Nuclear Deal Tests Japan's Policies
Inter News Service
“Indo-US Nuclear Deal Tests Japan’s Policies,” Inter Press Service News Agency, 9-14-06
Leading anti-nuke and environmental activists oppose Japan’s approval of the US-India nuclear deal on the grounds that India is not a member of the NPT. These groups joined forces to send a petition to the Japanese government urging it to oppose the lifting of restrictions by the NSG, of which Japan is a member.
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=34716
Speech to the Third Indo-US Economic Summit
Scoop News
“Speech to the Third Indo-US Economic Summit,” David C Mulford US Ambassador to India, 9-13-06
Transcript of Ambassador Mulford’s speech in which he states he believes US Senate will pass the nuclear cooperation bill quickly.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0609/S00243.htm
N-pact with India 'a big deal for US'
Times of India
“N-pact with India ‘a big deal’ for US,” Times of India, 9-15-06
The nuke deal with India is a big deal in American foreign policy to South Asia, said Richard Boucher, US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia. He said both the US and India were talking to members of the NSG to garner support, and that the recent thumbs-up from Brazil and South Africa is a good sign.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1993069.cms
Bush pushing Senate to vote on India nuclear deal
Washington Post
“Bush pushing Senate to vote on India nuclear deal,” Washington Post, 9-15-06
Bush has appealed to Republican leaders to push a vote on the India bill in this Congressional session. As yet, no date is set for discussion of the bill. Bush has told Republicans that this is a foreign policy priority for him.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/14/AR2006091401547.html
US Senate may skip N-deal till January 2007
Daily News & Analysis
“US Senate may skip N-deal till January 2007,” Daily News & Analysis, 9-15-06
A source close to the deal says the Senate will probably not discuss the deal in the current session. With the upcoming November elections in mind, most see the India deal as not a vote puller.
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1053053
Wednesday, September 13, 2006
Amendments to nuke deal no serious challenge
India Monitor
“Amendments to nuke deal no serious challenge,” India Monitor, 9-13-06
Senior nonproliferation expert Robert Einhorn says it will not be difficult for the US to strip the provisions from the US-India nuclear cooperation bill which New Delhi objected to. He believes that if the administration pushes it, the deal will get through in this Congress. He doubts that any NSG country will object to the idea, but stated that it is likely they would ask for similar treatment elsewhere, ie. Pakistan.
http://indiamonitor.com/news/readNews.jsp?ni=622
Finland does not commit support to Indo-US nuclear deal
Zee News
“Finland does not commit support to Indo-US nuke deal,” Zee News, 9-13-06
A member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group which must agree by consensus on the US-India deal, Finland has expressed reservations about the agreement, favoring multilateral nonproliferation regimes. Finland and other EU states are holding discussions to reach a common position on the issue for the NSG.
http://www.zeenews.com/znnew/articles.asp?aid=322193&sid=NAT
US arms control lobby seeks tougher nuclear bill
Telugu Portal
“US arms control lobby seeks tougher nuclear bill,” Telugu Portal, 9-13-06
US arms control experts press Senate to add tougher conditions for the US India nuclear deal, while the Bush administration is seeking the most lenient terms possible.
http://www.teluguportal.net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=13446
US-India nuclear deal faces new hurdle
Reuters
“US-India nuclear deal faces new hurdles,” Reuters, 9-13-06
There is a strong possibility that US Congress will not have the chance to give final approval to the US-India nuclear cooperation bill before the November elections because of other priorities and a busy schedule. Bush has rhetorically signed on to the deal but is not being seen as expending much political capital to push it through.
http://in.today.reuters.com/news/NewsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-09-13T045904Z_01_NOOTR_RTRJONC_0_India-267251-1.xml
Don't bother if nuke deal dails: Top scientist
The Financial Express
“Don’t bother if nuke deal fails: Top scientist,” The Financial Express, 9-13-06
Chairman of India’s Atomic Energy Commission, Anil Kakodkar, said India should not bother if the nuclear deal with the US does not go through, India’s program will continue on. He stated firmly that reprocessing must be allowed.
http://www.financialexpress.com/latest_full_story.php?content_id=140268
US envoy sees Senate approving India nuclear deal
Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/13/AR2006091300445.html
Tuesday, September 12, 2006
India now free to import tech for N-power units
Express News Service
“India now free to import tech for N-power units,” Express News Service, 9-11-06
Once the US nuclear deal goes through, India will be able to access technology from all over the world in its quest for efficient nuclear fission and nuclear waste management. The US will no longer be able to block countries from giving India nuclear reactors or fuel, says head of Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre under the Atomic Energy department.
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=200994
Fresh hitch for N-deal
Times of India
“Fresh hitch for N-deal,” Times of India, 9-12-06
The Title II of Senate bill, a law implementing IAEA Additional Protocol in the US, has caused a procedural wrangle in the Senate. The tagging of Title II to the India N-deal bill, a single issue legislation, is a departure form normal legislative practice. Some Senators are reluctant to sign on to the Additional Protocol.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1980456.cms
N-deal: Saran heading for talks with Burns
The Indian Express
“N-deal: Saran heading for talks with Burns,” The Indian Express, 9-12-06
As the working deadline for the Indo-US n-deal approaches, both sides are giving a renewed impetus to restart negotiations and clear the way of all obstacles. US Under Secretary for Political Affairs, Nick Burns, will meet India’s chief negotiator, Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran, in New York. France has indicated that it is keen to sign a similar deal with India for civil nuclear cooperation.
http://www.indianexpress.com/story/12479.html
Monday, September 11, 2006
Indo-US N-deal: Senate should "strip" title two of bill
Zee News
“Indo-US N-deal: Senate should “strip” title two of bill,” Zee News, 9-11-06
Heritage Foundation scholars state that US Senate should remove title ii from the bill concerning the US India nuclear deal so that the new legislation will be passed. Title ii involves the US signing on to the IAEA Additional Protocol. Senators have been wary to accept the Additional Protocol for national security reasons. The scholars believe that any further delay in reaching an agreement on the N-deal will jeopardize PM Singh’s chances of success in his own country.
http://www.zeenews.com/znnew/articles.asp?aid=321438&sid=NAT
US says nuclear double-standard on Iran justified
Reuters
“US says nuclear double-standard on Iran justified,” Reuters, 9-11-06
Richard Boucher, US Assistant Secretary of State, acknowledges that the US is employing a double-standard in its approaches to India and Iran’s nuclear programs. He claims this stance is justified by the behavior of the two countries.
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-09-11T104423Z_01_L11489773_RTRUKOC_0_US-USA-INDIA-IRAN.xml&WTmodLoc=NewsHome-C1-topNews-5
Time ripe for India to clinch nuclear deal: Stephen Cohen
The Hindu
“Time ripe for India to clinch nuclear deal: Stephen Cohen,” The Hindu, 9-11-06
Defense expert Stephen Cohen says now is the most likely time for India to get the N-deal through as another American President will not as receptive. He states that the deal still has a long way to go, and would be an opportunity lost for India if it does not become a reality.
http://www.hindu.com/2006/09/10/stories/2006091007540500.htm
Friday, September 08, 2006
Dynasty biggest challenge to democracy: Advani
Zee News
“Dynasty biggest challenge to democracy: Advani,” Zee News, 9-8-06
BJP leader, L K Advani, calls on Parliament to be vigilant on watching the US nuclear deal. He states that the deal is not concluded in the US Congress and that if the final product is detrimental to India, they will not just sit quiet.
http://www.zeenews.com/znnew/articles.asp?aid=321192&sid=NAT
Importance of N-deal
Indolink
“Importance of the N-deal,” Indolink, 9-7-06
The Cold War mindset of choosing either servility to the US or defiance of it is alive in India. There must be a distinction made between the fundamentals that India must remain steadfast with, and the cosmetic and unimportant that it can concede. The deal is a way out of the NPT for India, but it will not be easy for the US to negotiate because the NPT has served as the world’s article of faith for decades.
http://www.indolink.com/displayArticleS.php?id=090706111706
Safeguards can kick in only after cooperation starts
The Hindu
“Safeguards can kick in only after cooperation starts,” The Hindu, 9-8-06
This article contains excerpts of an interview with Chairman of the AEC, Anil Kakodkar. He responds to concerns raised about the changes to the US nuclear deal that may come out of US legislation. He follows Singh’s line on sticking to the July 2005 agreement, and that India must wait and see what the final legislation will be, then decide if it is in the spirit of the 2005 agreement, or not.
http://www.thehindu.com/2006/09/08/05hdline.htm
Reprocessing is a must: Kakodkar
The Hindu
“Reprocessing is a must: Kakodkar,” The Hindu, 9-8-06
Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, Anil Kakodar, states that reprocessing must be allowed and that India’s voluntary moratorium on testing would not become a bilateral treaty. He adds that ‘India-specific’ safeguards can only go into effect after cooperation has begun, not before. These statements were in response to questions concerning the limitations that US Congress put in their bills.
http://www.thehindu.com/2006/09/08/stories/2006090817300100.htm
Thursday, September 07, 2006
Bush admn wants Senate to pass Indo-US N-deal unchanged
Zee News
“Bush admn wants Senate to pass Indo-US N-deal unchanged,” Zee News, 9-07-06
Bush administration would like Senate to pass S3709 as is, and use the conference stage to apply pressure to drop provisions in the bill, aware of India’s apprehensions of any changes. There is a sense of urgency in the administration to get the bill passed before the 109th Congress adjourns on October 6. The linkage of the adoption of IAEA additional protocol may be a problem in passing the bill.
http://www.zeenews.com/articles.asp?aid=320107&sid=WOR
India's non-parallel foreign policy interests
Asian Tribune
“India’s non-parallel foreign policy interests,” Asian Tribune, 9-07-06
India has non-parallel foreign policy interests concerning Iran and the US, and must recognize this so to lessen the adverse impact of the diverging interests. India requires good relations with both Iran and the US, and should not see the stand-off in zero-sum terms. India needs to remain independent of both countries influence.
http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/1869
India should accept changes in N-deal
Times of India
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1960732,curpg-2.cms
Albright backs Indo-US nuke deal
Times of India
“Albright backs Indo-US nuke deal,” Times of India, 9-07-06
Former US secretary of state supports the nuke deal because she believes it will help India meet its energy needs and bring India into the non-proliferation world, in which she sees India as part of the solution to non-proliferation problems. She says that democrats support a stronger relationship with India and that the deal will pass through Congress.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1960260.cms
China gives guarded response on Indo-US civilian nuke deal
Daily News & Analysis
“China gives guarded response on Indo-US civilian nuke deal,” Daily News & Analysis, 9-07-06
Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Kong told Indian journalists that the US-India deal should contribute to peace and security if implemented. He said they should work under non-proliferation mechanisms and fulfill their international obligations.
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1051658
Friday, September 01, 2006
The world's Iran Problem hits another milepost
The Oregonian
“The world’s Iran Problem hits another milestone,” The Oregonian, 9-1-06
The US has further complicated possible responses to Iran’s defiance of the United Nations by negotiating a civil nuclear deal with India, which is not party to the NPT as Iran is.
http://www.oregonlive.com/editorials/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/editorial/115706851145290.xml&coll=7
Thursday, August 31, 2006
Democracy versus diplomacy
The Pioneer
“Democracy versus diplomacy,” The Pioneer, 8-31-06
The US nuclear deal has come at a price of hamstringing PM Singh, having sapped much of his political capital and deviated his attention from all else. The PM is likely to only traverse a risk-averse, quiet foreign policy from here forward.
http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnist1.asp?main_variable=Columnist&file_name=ashok%2Fashok36.txt&writer=ashok
PM has addressed all issues on US N deal
The Financial Express
“PM has addressed all issues on US N deal,” Financial Express, 8-31-06
Anil Kakodkar, Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, says that PM Singh has addressed all of the concerns raised by the scientific community concerning the US nuclear deal.
http://www.financialexpress.com/latest_full_story.php?content_id=138986
Today's Editorial: Nuclear Synergy
The Times of India
“Today’s Editorial: Nuclear Synergy,” The Times of India, 8-31-06
There remains bureaucratic opposition in India to the US nuclear deal. New heckles have been raised by Rao, the head of the scientific advisory council, who stated that the nuclear energy sector should be opened to private investment. The author believes that the true benefits of the US deal will not be felt unless the sector is open to private and foreign players.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1941068.cms
All Eyes on teh Senate as India Plays Hardball
Carnegie Endowment Publications
“All Eyes on the Senate as India Plays Hard Ball,” Carnegie Endowment, 8-29-06
Singh’s firm stance that India will not accept any deal that shifts the goalposts of the July 2005 agreement is based on an assurance form President Bush that the deal will go through as planned. The ball is in the Senate’s court, which has to decide how important the deal is to them and perhaps be willing to go up against an unwavering India. Some believe Senate will tone down the language so as not to upset a key ally in tumultuous times.
http://www.carnegieendowment.org/npp/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=18661
India names special envoy for US nuclear deal
Washington Post
“India names special envoy for US nuclear deal,” Washington Post, 8-31-06
Shyam Saran, the outgoing foreign secretary, has been named special envoy for negotiations over the US nuclear deal. Shiv Shankar Menon, India’s envoy to Pakistan, will succeed Saran as the next foreign secretary.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083100332.html
Bush's love of India will outlast him
The Financial Times
“Bush’s love of India will outlast him,” Financial Times, 8-31-06
With the US-India nuclear deal, Bush signaled he believes closer cooperation with India more important than protecting nonproliferation mechanisms. Opposition to the deal in both countries will most likely not derail the deal. The new relationship will outlast Bush for three reasons: India’s 8% annual growth, India as an ally against Islamism and a rising China.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14587895/
Wednesday, August 30, 2006
Iran explains its N-plans to India
Dialy News & Analysis
“Iran explains its N-plans to India,” Daily News & Analysis, 8-29-06
Iran explains its response to the West’s incentives package and is lobbying for support of Iran’s right to nuclear power development. With the Senate vote on the India nuclear bill in the coming months, India will have to be very careful with its responses to Iran’s moves with regard to its nuclear program.
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1050002
Iran reference in N-bill a mistake: US expert
Daily News & Analysis
“Iran reference in N-bill a mistake: US expert,” Daily News & Analysis, 8-30-06
US expert, George Perkovich, states that the House bill referencing Iran was a mistake and that the US did not buy India’s vote in the IAEA. He sees the nuclear deal as a massive change in US nuclear weapons philosophy. Now it is about who owns nuclear weapons, with different rules for the good guys. He sees the deal as a loss for nonproliferation.
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1050053
Procedural linkage slows Senate clearance
The Indian Express
“Procedural linkage slows Senate clearance,” The Indian Express, 8-30-06
The pace of clearance of the Indo-US civil nuclear cooperation bill has been slowed in the Senate due to a tagging of the implementation of the Additional Protocol in the US with the India deal. Some Senators do not see the Protocol as good for the US and want a full debate. The India deal has nothing to do with the tagged Protocol, but it may be very difficult to delink one from the other, slowing progress.
http://www.indianexpress.com/story/11663.html
No Dilution of N-deal - India Asserts to US
Indolink
“No Dilution of N-deal – India Asserts to US,” Indolink, 8-30-06
India will only accept the nuclear deal with the US if it is in the country’s interests. PM Singh has stressed this, allaying concerns in his country and sending a signal to US lawmakers that they cannot ignore India’s legitimate concerns if the deal is to go through.
http://www.indolink.com/displayArticleS.php?id=082906102030
PM's science czar wants pvt sector in N-energy
Hindustan Times
“PM’s science czar wants pvt sector in N-energy,” Hindustan Times, 8-29-06
CNR Rao, head of the Scientific Advisory Council, is seeking reforms to allow the private sector to enter the nuclear power field. Although he says this will help improve the country’s energy situation, government officials have reacted strongly, suggesting that private participation will raise safety and security concerns.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1781193,0008.htm
Nuclear deal: As equal or junior partner
The Organiser
“Nuclear deal: As equal or junior partner,” The Organiser, 9-03-06
India’s foreign policy is driven by a junior partner mindset. The country’s leaders see benefit for themselves in the nuclear deal. But for a true beneficial bilateral relationship, trust must be nurtured. US is not going to make India a nuclear power with the deal, but the people of India will not stand for a junior partner status. India must recognize though that it will have to give something back to the US, such as support in Iraq.
http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=146&page=29
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
Sweden, Norway give positive response to Indo-US N-deal
Daily News & Analysis
“Sweden, Norway give positive response to Indo-US N-deal,” Daily News and Analysis, 8-28-06
Sweden and Norway, countries that previously had doubts about the deal, expressed support for the proposed agreement on India in the Nuclear Suppliers Group. The NSG must agree by consensus to allow the international community to open nuclear trade with India.
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1049712
Tricky deal: India's next foreign minister
Asia Times
“Tricky deal: India’s next foreign minister,” Asia Times, 8-30-06
A new appointment for India’s foreign minister position will be a tough decision for PM Singh to make. The PM is closely aligned to the US-India nuclear deal and will want an appointee who echoes his views on this issue.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/HH30Df01.html
India to pursue weapons programme regardless of N-deal
Daily News & Analysis
“India to pursue weapons programme regardless of N-deal,” Daily News & Analysis, 8-29-06
Indian Ambassador to the US, Ronen Sen, stated that India’s strategic weapons program will continue regardless of any deal brokered with the US. He claims the N-deal’s purpose is to meet India’s energy needs, not about security or proliferation. Sen says that India does not need any nuclear technology from the US but that his country needs commercial investment in the nuclear energy sector.
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1049838
India to pursue weapons programme regardless of N-deal
Daily News & Analysis
“India to pursue weapons programme regardless of N-deal,” Daily News & Analysis, 8-29-06
Indian Ambassador to the US, Ronen Sen, stated that India’s strategic weapons program will continue regardless of any deal brokered with the US. He claims the N-deal’s purpose is to meet India’s energy needs, not about security or proliferation. Sen says that India does not need any nuclear technology from the US but that his country needs commercial investment in the nuclear energy sector.
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1049838
AEC meeting focuses on Indo-US nuclear deal
Islamic Republic News Agency
“AEC meeting focuses on Indo-US nuclear deal,” Islamic Republic News Agency, 8-26-06
The Saturday meeting of PM Singh and the Atomic Energy Commission focuses on the Indo-US deal and the severe shortage of nuclear fuel India is facing, allowing the country’s nuclear power plants to run at only 65% of capacity. The Indo-US deal is expected to remedy this problem by allowing the international community to supply uranium to India.
http://www.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-239/0608261423135205.htm
Monday, August 28, 2006
Who is right about nuclear deal?
Asian Tribune
“Who is right about the nuclear deal?” Asian Tribune, 8-26-08
The PM did not say anything new in his address to Parliament, but has reaffirmed his position that India will not hesitate to walk away if the nuclear deal deviates from the July 2005 agreement. The debate in India will continue as there exists a divide over mistrust for America and a desire to have close relations with Washington. The author states that the issue of energy security should be debated in Parliament, and the issue of India’s ability to make more weapons if the deal goes through should be addressed.
http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/1726
The Indo-US Nuclear Deal: The PM's Rajya Sabha Statement
People's Democracy
“The Indo-US Nuclear Deal: The PM’s Rajya Sabha Statement,” People’s Democracy, 8-28-06
The CPI(M) states that the PM must be true to his statements in Parliament and uphold his commitment to the original July 2005 agreement. Also, India should in no way be pressured to fall in line with US foreign policy, especially concerning Iran and Israel.
http://pd.cpim.org/2006/0827/08272006_snd.htm
PM wins over top scientists to N-deal
Times of India
“PM wins over top scientists to N-deal,” Times of India, 8-26-08
PM Singh clears a hurdle to the US-India nuclear deal by convincing the country’s top scientists that the deal will not hurt India. He succeeded in enlisting the scientists to help negotiate the details of the safeguards and protocols, and restated his commitment to the July 2005 agreement.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1929494.cms
India should not be considered a pushover
Rediff News
“India should not be considered a pushover,” rediff news, 8-28-06
A former elite Indian scientist disagrees with the course the US-India nuclear deal is taking. He believes the US is managing the deal and creating conditions that are unacceptable to India and are not in the spirit of the July 2005 agreement. To reconcile differences, careful diplomacy will be required on all sides.
http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/aug/26prasad.htm
Friday, August 25, 2006
Pakistan's Nulcear Arsenal
Voice of America News
Pakistan’s Nuclear Arsenal,” Voice of America News, 8-22-06
The article discusses Pakistan’s history and recent build-up of its nuclear arsenal. Pakistan is increasingly worried about the nuclear deal between the US and India. With Pakistan’s build-up come safety concerns and pressure for the US to try to negotiate safeguards for Pakistan’s facilities.
http://www.voanews.com/english/NewsAnalysis/Pakistan2006-08-22-voa66.cfm
A Thaw between India and China
LA Times
“A Thaw between India and China,” L.A. Times, 8-25-06
Improved ties between India and US, demonstrated in the civil nuclear deal, some see as a way for both countries to offset China’s growing influence in Asia and keep Beijing more occupied with New Delhi than Washington. China views this strategy as containment, although some experts claim security in Asia does not have to be a zero-sum game.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-chindia25aug25,0,6381508,full.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Thursday, August 24, 2006
"Parity", did you say?
The Indian Express
“‘Parity’, did you say?” The Indian Express, 8-24-06
In a continuation of his previous article, Arun Shourie again takes aim at the proposed changes to the US-India nuclear deal, rebuffing the claims of the Singh government that parity with the US will be achieved. He writes that in reality, India will become completely dependent on the US for not only energy, but also national security.
http://www.indianexpress.com/story/11240.html
This is about energy, did you say?
The Indian Express
“This is about energy, did you say?” The Indian Express, 8-23-06
BJP head Arun Shourie dissects the House and Senate floor bills, laying bare what he believes to be the averse implications of their amendments to Indian sovereignty and the future of its nuclear program. He blames the Singh government for hiding the deleterious truths of the Congressional changes.
http://www.indianexpress.com/story/11160.html
CPM asks govet to spell strategy on nuke deal
The Hindustan Times
“CPM asks Govt to spell strategy on nuke deal,” Hindustan Times, 8-23-06
Communist Party of India (Marxist) asked the Singh government to state clearly its intentions if a bill comes out of US Congress containing alterations to the original July 2005 agreement.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1775928,0000.htm
Future of the nuclear deal
The Daily Pioneer
“Future of the nuclear deal,” The Daily Pioneer, 8-23-06
G Parthasarathy commends PM Singh and Indian Parliament for constructively discussing the nuclear deal and solidifying India’s stance that it will not accept changes to the July 2005 agreement, or allow the deal to threaten India’s sovereignty or national security. The writer expresses disappointment with the amendments made by US Congress to the deal and doubts if the deal is possible with them.
http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnist1.asp?main_variable=Columnist&file_name=parthasarathy%2Fparthasarathy114.txt&writer=parthasarathy
India to retain 'sovereign right' on N-tests: PM
Daily News & Analysis
“India to retain ‘sovereign right on N-tests: PM,”, Daily News & Analysis, 8-23-06
PM Singh rules out any cap on India’s military nucleawr program, stating that there will be no bilateral agreement with the US on testing or fissile material production. Singh again stressed that India will not accept a deal that deviates from the July 2005 agreement.
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1048948
Wednesday, August 23, 2006
India has to protect its geo-economic interests: air chief
Telugu Portal
“India has to protect its geo-economic interests: air chief,” Telugu Portal, 8-23-06
Indian Air Force Chief states that India desires a stable political environment and reliable energy flow to provide security. He believes the US-India deal will assist India in meeting its energy needs.
http://www.teluguportal.net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=10940
India nuclear plant combed for armed intruders
Gulf Daily News
“India nuclear plant combed for armed intruders,” Gulf Daily News, 8-23-06
Special forces and police searched an Indian nuclear power facility in the Surat district in response to reports that armed men were seen entering the complex. The facility is heavily guarded and the men are thought to not have gotten beyond the perimeter. In July the Defense Ministry warned that Islamic militants from Pakistan were targeting nuclear and other sites in India.
http://www.gulf-daily-news.com/Story.asp?Article=153455&Sn=WORL&IssueID=29156
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
Resolution of key issues essential for peace
Dawn
“Resolution of key issues essential for peace: Aziz,” Dawn, 8-22-06
Pakistani Prime Minister Aziz states that his country seeks peace and stability in the region, and that it does not want to engage in an arms race, although he stressed the importance of maintaining a modern force and credible minimum deterrent.
http://www.dawn.com/2006/08/22/top7.htm
Police hunt for armed men near atomic plant
Reuters
“Police hunt for armed men near atomic plant,” Reuters, 8-22-06
Police in the Surat District are searching for two armed men reportedly lurking in the exclusive zone of the nuclear power plant there.
http://in.today.reuters.com/news/NewsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-08-22T172719Z_01_NOOTR_RTRJONC_0_India-264446-1.xml
N-deal: US Congress warned of Indian limits
Rediff News
“N-deal: US Congress warned of Indian limits,” rediff news, 8-22-06
Former Chairman of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, Dr. A Gopalakrishnan, calls on PM Singh to convey his strong policy stance on the US-India N-deal to President Bush and Congress. He comments on his concerns over test bans, linkages to extraneous issues and reciprocity. He finishes the article by placing the ball in Congress’s court.
http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/aug/22ndeal1.htm
PM to placate nuke scientists
The Times of India
“PM to placate nuke scientists,” The Times of India, 8-22-06
Prime Minister Singh to meet with a delegation from the Atomic Energy Commission and other scientists to assure them that the US-India deal will not harm Indian national interests.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1914145.cms
Monday, August 21, 2006
PM seeks to clear smoke over nuke deal during fiery debate
The Statesman
“PM seeks to clear smoke over nuke deal during fiery debate,” The Statesman, 8-20-06
PM Singh declares firm India’s independent nuclear policy. While stressing good relations with the US are vital to Indian national security, the PM asserted that India will not bow to US pressure over its nuclear program or other foreign policy issues. A senior member of BJP, Mr. Sinha, expresses his concerns with the deal, calling it one-sided.
http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=2&theme=&usrsess=1&id=127009